dedication, perseverance, self-discipline

Sound to Narrows 12k

Recent EntriesHomeJoin Fast Running Blog Community!PredictorHealthy RecipesJeffmc's RacesFind BlogsMileage BoardTop Ten Excuses for Missing a RunTop Ten Training MistakesDiscussion ForumRace Reports Send A Private MessageWeek ViewMonth ViewYear View
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
15% off for Fast Running Blog members at St. George Running Center!

Location:

Alpine,UT,USA

Member Since:

Jan 01, 2008

Gender:

Male

Goal Type:

Olympic Trials Qualifier

Running Accomplishments:

3K: 8:58 Pocatello, ID 2003 (indoors at Idaho State)

5K: 14:55 Salt Lake City, UT 2010 (Law Day 5k)

10K: 29:33 Salt Lake City, UT 2010 (Des News 10k)

1/2 marathon: 1:06:59 Provo, UT 2010 (Utah Valley Half)

marathon: 2:21:59 St. George, UT 2009 (St. George Marathon)

Short-Term Running Goals:

To get running higher mileage more consistently without getting injured

Sub 2:19:00 marathon

Personal:

I used to run competitively, and maybe I will do so again someday.  Right now I am primarily running to try and get in better shape, and to maintain both physical and emotional health, but also for the simple joy that comes when I run.

I am also the proud daddy of five little ones.  I love the opportunity that I have to be a daddy, and my challenge is to balance my family responsibilities with work and running.

Click to donate
to Ukraine's Armed Forces
Miles:This week: 0.00 Month: 0.00 Year: 0.00
Asics Speedstar Lifetime Miles: 2020.05
Asics Gel Ohana Racer Lifetime Miles: 2332.20
Adidas Adizero Lifetime Miles: 1375.45
Barefoot Lifetime Miles: 183.10
Nike Free 5.0 Lifetime Miles: 2221.85
Saucony Kinvara Lifetime Miles: 795.92
Puma Faas 200 Lifetime Miles: 381.50
Puma Faas 250 Lifetime Miles: 466.10
Altra Adam Lifetime Miles: 1836.85
Baretrek Lifetime Miles: 290.15
Hoka Conquest Lifetime Miles: 41.00
Race: Sound to Narrows 12k (7.46 Miles) 00:40:27, Place overall: 4
Easy MilesMarathon Pace MilesThreshold MilesVO2 Max MilesTotal Distance
11.540.000.007.4619.00

Well, I can't say I am happy with how the race went today, but at the same time I can't say that I didn't expect something like this to happen. Money went three deep. I was a few seconds out of third ($50) and no more than 14 seconds out of second ($150). I just didn't feel like I had it there today. If I would have run like I can I think I would have placed second, but I think that a combination of travel, bad sleep a couple of nights ago, and running more miles this week than I have ever run just took away that little bit extra that I needed. Well, here is how the race went.

1 mile: 5:01 - Downhill, we took it easy and ran as a pack.

2 miles: 5:06 (10:07) - Downhill at first, then hit the first hill of the course to start the rollers. I was with the second place finisher at this point. The winner had already taken off and left us.

3 miles: 5:40 (15:47) - A good portion of this mile was uphill, and fairly steep so I backed off. The second place runner moved up, and I went back with a group of three runners and started running with them.

4 miles: 5:22 (21:09) - A little more downhill on this mile but still rolling. It was during this mile that I realized that every time we started heading uphill, I was losing ground to the other guys, but that once it evened out or headed down I would hold even with them or pass them with less effort then on the uphill sections. I just didn't feel very strong on the uphill sections for some reason.

5 miles: 5:40 (26:49) - Another uphill mile. At this point I was in 5th and maybe 10 seconds behind 2nd place and 5 seconds behind 3rd and 4th.

6 miles: ~5:11 (32:00) - Another downhill mile. I couldn't see the mile marker but from where it should have been I think I guessed my mile time pretty good. The 3rd and 4th place runners have now caught up to the 2nd place guy and are running with him. I am about the same distance behind as before, maybe a little closer.

7.46 miles: 40:27 - We went up one hill just past 6 miles and the 4th place runner started to fade. The road flattened out and I caught him just a little bit later. We then turned the corner and started back up the hill to the start and the same thing happened just like earlier; the guys in front all started pulling away. They got a decent sized gap on me and then it started flattening out a bit and they started coming back. I made up almost the entire gap that the third place runner had on me, but I ran out of room and finished in fourth.

So, I am kind of disappointed with the finish, and I was hoping to finish about 30 seconds faster, which would have placed me in 2nd. There was a light wind as well which might have slowed me down by 10-15 seconds over the course of the race, but there is no saying for sure. But, I guess I can take consolation in knowing that I did well considering the situation with traveling and not feeling 100 percent for the race.

Comments
From josse on Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 16:18:55

It is allways hard to travel for a race. I think it takes it out of you. I think you did a fine job on your race. You allways blow me away with your times.

From mattk on Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 00:21:28

I just looked up the results online. 4th out of 1100 guys is always good. Looks like the guy who won has cracked off a 2:14 marathon. Is that your brother who got 12th?

From jtshad on Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 09:18:09

Solid run nonetheless. Sounds like a strange tactical race.

See you Friday. The guys in van 2 are stoking up theirs as the party van, we have to make sure we make van 1 a match for their enthusiasm.

From Sasha Pachev on Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:06:21

Matt Downin has run a 28:08 10000 on the track. Last time he finished a marathon was 2005 in NYC. His time was 2:14:28. NYC is not fast at all, at least 2 minutes slower than a nice flat course. Martin Lel type of runner has a hard time breaking 2:09 in NYC. It is encouraging that he beat you by only 2 minutes even though he was not going all out. He did run in the marathon trials and DNF'ed. Probably a better evaluation of the course would be from this:

2007 results

Mike Sayekno 38:25 while being beat by Matt Downin in 37:39. So safe to assume Sayenko went all out. So for Saynko we have the following racing history around that time:

http://www.athlinks.com/myresults.aspx?rid=17093419

Plus, he ran 2:18:35 in the Trials. So with Sayenko's endurance you would have been about 7:00-7:30 behind him on the Trial's course. That gives you about 2:25-2:26, or somewhere around 2:20 in St. George. Which actually nicely correlates with Sean Sundwall's 39:55 in the same race.

From Sean Sundwall on Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 13:35:22

Your time was completely respectiable. I've run that race three times and the end is more brutal than the end of any race I've run. Even the "flat" parts are deceptively challenging and it's a hard course to stay focused on. I would have run it this year but it conflicted with the race in Fall City on Saturday. Plus, I'm becoming less and less of a fan of the non-standard distances such as 12k.

I know the second place finisher well and he is a VERY strong runner. His legs are very powerful and he has a lot of determination and grit. We battled throughout this race last year and it wasn't until the final hill that I was ablt to finally put him behind me. He got me back by beating me at the tape in the PNTF Regional CC Championships last fall.

I was disappointed to see such a lame turnout this year. None of the three OTQers from the state of Washington ran it (including myself). It doesn't yield great times which has always been a knock against the race.

Anyway, it's a tough course and you had a good time.

From Sean Sundwall on Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 13:38:18

One other thing...in reviewing your race report more carefully I have only one recommendation: your first mile needed to be faster. I know it's a pretty agressive downhill, but one of the regrets I have from last year is not hitting that harder. The advantage lost by running ahead of the big pack for the first downhill stretch is more than made up for by going full blast down the hill. Next time I would shoot for a 4:45 going down the hill.

From jeffmc on Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 19:33:37

I agree with you about needing to hit the first mile harder. We all went out slow and I was surprised by how slow the first mile was. At the time I thought it was ok because it meant I would have more left at the end, however with my issues on the hills it probably would have helped me more than it would have hurt me because it would have given me a cusion to fall back on when I started struggling on the uphill sections.

On a side note, I also know Ben Mangrum fairly well. He is my brother's cross country coach and I run with them whenever I am in town. The only other race I ran against him was a thanksgiving 5k and he beat me because I started too slow and ran out of room as I was catching him near the end.

Add Your Comment.
  • Keep it family-safe. No vulgar or profane language. To discourage anonymous comments of cowardly nature, your IP address will be logged and posted next to your comment.
  • Do not respond to another person's comment out of context. If he made the original comment on another page/blog entry, go to that entry and respond there.
  • If all you want to do is contact the blogger and your comment is not connected with this entry and has no relevance to others, send a private message instead.
Only registered users with public blogs are allowed to post comments. Log in with your username and password or create an account and set up a blog.
Debt Reduction Calculator
Featured Announcements
Lone Faithfuls
(need a comment):
Recent Comments: